Atlas / Organisations / US People's Party
US People's Party
Populists · 1892–1908 · United States · Agrarian Populist · Electoral party · coding confidence medium
Each axis runs from −10 to +10, with zero a genuine mixed or balanced position rather than an absence of opinion. A score describes a stated position and a governing record; it is not a judgement of merit. What each score means →
Core principles
Producers against financiers: farmers and workers against banks, railroads and monopolies.
Economic model
Free silver, public ownership of railroads and telegraphs, a postal savings bank, graduated income tax.
Organisation of powers
Direct election of senators, secret ballot, initiative and referendum.
Reading note
The origin of the word 'populist'. Its programme was economically radical and institutionally democratising — very unlike most movements now given the label.
Check a claim about US People's Party. The interactive atlas measures the distance between any two organisations across all six axes and shows which ones carry the disagreement.
Open in the atlasThe evidence for every score
All six cells are sourced. A rationale explains what the score is measuring and each artefact is something a third party can check without taking anyone's word for it.
EC · Economic organisation · scored −03
Coded −3: public ownership of railroads and telegraphs, free silver, graduated income tax.
- Programme textThe 1892 Omaha Platform demands government ownership of railroads and telegraph.
CU · Social and cultural order · scored +01
Coded +1: producerist and evangelical, with a fusion record on race that varied by state.
- ScholarshipNorth Carolina Populists fused with Black Republicans in 1894; Southern Populists elsewhere accepted disenfranchisement.
AU · Organisation of power · scored −02
Coded −2: direct election of senators, secret ballot, initiative and referendum.
- Programme textThe Omaha Platform demands all three as constraints on concentrated power.
SC · Scale of decision · scored 00
Coded at zero: national ownership of infrastructure with local cooperative organisation.
- Programme textThe subtreasury plan proposed federal warehouses serving local farmers.
ID · Rule of membership · scored +04
Coded +4: producerist framing with immigration restriction in the platform.
- Programme textThe Omaha Platform opposes what it calls the importation of pauperised labour.
CH · Method and tempo · scored −03
Coded −3: a third party contesting elections and then fusing.
- Documented act or statuteFused with the Democrats behind Bryan in 1896 and was absorbed.
Where it came from, and what came after
- was succeeded byUS Democratic Party
The People's Party fused with the Democrats behind Bryan in 1896 and was absorbed.
Nearest organisations by measured distance
Straight-line separation across all six axes, out of a maximum of 49.0. Proximity means similarity of stated position, not endorsement and not resemblance in outcome.
Countries
Cite this page
Scores are revised on evidence, so a citation should carry the version it refers to. Version 4.3.1 is current; the revision log records every change.
Free to quote and reproduce with attribution. This is a synthesis rather than a peer-reviewed dataset — where an authoritative figure is needed, cite the Chapel Hill Expert Survey, the Manifesto Project or V-Dem.