Atlas / Organisations / Jeffersonian Republicans
Jeffersonian Republicans
Democratic-Republicans · 1792–1825 · United States · Liberal · Electoral party · coding confidence high
Each axis runs from −10 to +10, with zero a genuine mixed or balanced position rather than an absence of opinion. A score describes a stated position and a governing record; it is not a judgement of merit. What each score means →
Core principles
Agrarian republic, states' rights, suspicion of banks, standing armies and concentrated wealth.
Economic model
Independent yeoman farming, free trade, hostility to central banking — alongside plantation slavery.
Organisation of powers
Strict construction of federal power, strong states, weak executive.
Reading note
An early demonstration that anti-centralism and egalitarian rhetoric can coexist with the most extreme exclusion rule of all.
Check a claim about Jeffersonian Republicans. The interactive atlas measures the distance between any two organisations across all six axes and shows which ones carry the disagreement.
Open in the atlasThe evidence for every score
All six cells are sourced. A rationale explains what the score is measuring and each artefact is something a third party can check without taking anyone's word for it.
EC · Economic organisation · scored +07
Coded +7: yeoman farming, free trade and hostility to central banking.
- Documented act or statuteThe First Bank's charter was allowed to lapse in 1811.
CU · Social and cultural order · scored +03
Coded +3: religious freedom and anticlericalism within a slave society.
- Programme textThe Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom of 1786 was Jefferson's own drafting.
AU · Organisation of power · scored −07
Coded −7: strict construction, strong states, weak executive.
- Programme textThe Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798 asserted state authority to judge federal acts.
SC · Scale of decision · scored −07
At the local end: states as the primary units.
- Programme textFederal power was to be confined to enumerated purposes.
ID · Rule of membership · scored +05
Coded +5: the most extreme exclusion rule of all, coexisting with egalitarian rhetoric.
- Documented act or statuteThe party's electoral base was the slaveholding South and its leaders were slaveholders.
CH · Method and tempo · scored −04
Coded −4: electoral, with the 1800 transfer of power as the founding precedent.
- Documented act or statuteThe peaceful transfer after the 1800 election was the first between rival parties in a modern republic.
Where it came from, and what came after
- split fromAmerican Federalists
The first party system formed around the ratification argument itself.
Nearest organisations by measured distance
Straight-line separation across all six axes, out of a maximum of 49.0. Proximity means similarity of stated position, not endorsement and not resemblance in outcome.
- Athenian Democracy5.6
- Distributism5.6
- New Flemish Alliance5.7
- American Fusionist Conservatism6.0
- ACT New Zealand6.5
- Whig Constitutionalism7.7
Countries
Cite this page
Scores are revised on evidence, so a citation should carry the version it refers to. Version 4.3.1 is current; the revision log records every change.
Free to quote and reproduce with attribution. This is a synthesis rather than a peer-reviewed dataset — where an authoritative figure is needed, cite the Chapel Hill Expert Survey, the Manifesto Project or V-Dem.