Atlas / Organisations / Liberation Theology
Liberation Theology
1968– · Latin America · Christian Socialist · Doctrine / school · coding confidence medium
Each axis runs from −10 to +10, with zero a genuine mixed or balanced position rather than an absence of opinion. A score describes a stated position and a governing record; it is not a judgement of merit. What each score means →
Core principles
A preferential option for the poor, with Christian faith read as a demand for structural change here and now.
Economic model
Land reform, cooperatives, critique of dependency and of concentrated ownership.
Organisation of powers
Base ecclesial communities: small, self-governing congregational units.
Reading note
Religiously traditional in source and socially radical in application, which splits its cultural coding.
Check a claim about Liberation Theology. The interactive atlas measures the distance between any two organisations across all six axes and shows which ones carry the disagreement.
Open in the atlasThe evidence for every score
All six cells are sourced. A rationale explains what the score is measuring and each artefact is something a third party can check without taking anyone's word for it.
EC · Economic organisation · scored −07
Coded −7: structural critique of ownership and dependency.
- Programme textGutiérrez's A Theology of Liberation (1971) frames poverty as a structural sin rather than a misfortune.
CU · Social and cultural order · scored −02
Coded −2: religiously traditional in source and socially radical in application.
- Documented act or statuteThe Medellín conference of 1968 committed the Latin American church to the poor.
AU · Organisation of power · scored −05
Coded −5: base communities as small self-governing congregational units.
- Documented act or statuteComunidades eclesiales de base numbered in the tens of thousands in Brazil by the 1980s.
SC · Scale of decision · scored −06
Coded −6: the base community as the unit of action.
- Programme textAuthority runs from the congregation upward in the model.
ID · Rule of membership · scored −06
Coded −6: a preferential option for the poor as such.
- Programme textThe formulation is universal in address and particular in priority.
CH · Method and tempo · scored +03
Coded +3: divided over whether force was legitimate.
- ScholarshipCamilo Torres joined a guerrilla group; Gutiérrez and Boff argued for non-violent structural change.
Where it came from, and what came after
- takes its doctrine fromClassical Marxism
Latin American theologians adopted a class analysis of poverty as structural rather than incidental.
Nearest organisations by measured distance
Straight-line separation across all six axes, out of a maximum of 49.0. Proximity means similarity of stated position, not endorsement and not resemblance in outcome.
- Degrowth5.3
- Socialist Revolutionaries5.9
- The Diggers6.3
- Guild Socialism6.9
- Kurdish Democratic Movement7.1
- Democratic Confederalism7.3
Cite this page
Scores are revised on evidence, so a citation should carry the version it refers to. Version 4.3.1 is current; the revision log records every change.
Free to quote and reproduce with attribution. This is a synthesis rather than a peer-reviewed dataset — where an authoritative figure is needed, cite the Chapel Hill Expert Survey, the Manifesto Project or V-Dem.