Atlas / Organisations / Athenian Democracy
Athenian Democracy
Demokratia · c.508–322 BCE · Athens · Republican / Democratic · Held state power · coding confidence medium
Each axis runs from −10 to +10, with zero a genuine mixed or balanced position rather than an absence of opinion. A score describes a stated position and a governing record; it is not a judgement of merit. What each score means →
Core principles
Direct rule by the assembly of citizens, offices filled by lot, no professional political class.
Economic model
Agrarian and mercantile private property, slave labour, liturgies obliging the rich to fund public works.
Organisation of powers
Sovereign assembly, randomly selected council and juries, magistrates subject to audit and ostracism.
Reading note
Radically dispersed authority combined with a violently narrow membership rule: women, resident foreigners and the enslaved were excluded. A reminder that 'democratic' and 'inclusive' are separate measurements.
Check a claim about Athenian Democracy. The interactive atlas measures the distance between any two organisations across all six axes and shows which ones carry the disagreement.
Open in the atlasThe evidence for every score
All six cells are sourced. A rationale explains what the score is measuring and each artefact is something a third party can check without taking anyone's word for it.
EC · Economic organisation · scored +04
Coded +4: private property and slave labour, with liturgies obliging the rich to fund public works.
- Documented act or statuteWealthy citizens were assigned trierarchies and choral funding as compulsory personal expenditure.
CU · Social and cultural order · scored +03
Coded +3: civic egalitarianism among citizens inside a rigidly restricted household order.
- ScholarshipCitizen women had no political rights and limited legal capacity throughout.
AU · Organisation of power · scored −07
Coded −7: offices filled by lot, magistrates audited, leaders removable by ostracism.
- Documented act or statuteMost offices were allocated by sortition; every official faced a mandatory audit on leaving.
SC · Scale of decision · scored −04
Coded −4: the assembly of citizens as the sovereign body.
- Documented act or statuteThe ekklesia met around forty times a year and decided policy directly.
ID · Rule of membership · scored +08
Coded +8: citizenship restricted by descent from 451 BCE.
- Documented act or statutePericles' citizenship law required both parents to be Athenian.
CH · Method and tempo · scored −02
Coded −2: change by decree of the assembly, with two oligarchic coups.
- Documented act or statuteOligarchic seizures occurred in 411 and 404 BCE and were both reversed.
Where it came from, and what came after
- was succeeded byRoman Republican Constitutionalism
Two different answers to the same question, and the source of the mixed-constitution argument.
Nearest organisations by measured distance
Straight-line separation across all six axes, out of a maximum of 49.0. Proximity means similarity of stated position, not endorsement and not resemblance in outcome.
- Jeffersonian Republicans5.6
- Distributism7.5
- Whig Constitutionalism7.9
- Baltic Restorationist Nationalism7.9
- New Flemish Alliance8.2
- ACT New Zealand8.4
Cite this page
Scores are revised on evidence, so a citation should carry the version it refers to. Version 4.3.1 is current; the revision log records every change.
Free to quote and reproduce with attribution. This is a synthesis rather than a peer-reviewed dataset — where an authoritative figure is needed, cite the Chapel Hill Expert Survey, the Manifesto Project or V-Dem.