Atlas / Comparisons / Stalinism vs US Republican Party

Stalinism and US Republican Party

Measured distance across six axes

23.2 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on CU, ID. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, SC, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisSocialism in one countryGOPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−10+0616DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+03+063AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+10+037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
SC · Scale of decision+10 0010DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership+03+041AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo+08−0311DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Socialism in one country · EC −10

Private ownership of productive assets was eliminated outright and allocation was set by physical plan targets rather than prices.

  • Documented act or statuteThe first Five-Year Plan from 1928 placed all industry under state ownership and central targets.
  • Documented act or statuteCollectivisation from 1929 abolished private farming; roughly a quarter of a million households were deported as kulaks.

GOP · EC +06

Market-oriented on taxation and regulation, with a substantial tariff turn since 2017 that pulls it back toward the centre.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate rate from 35 to 21 percent.
  • Documented act or statuteBroad tariffs from 2018 onward are a protectionist instrument and are coded as pulling the score left of where the 1990s party sat.

Socialism in one country · SC +10

The most centralised state then in existence, with republics nominally federal and actually administered from Moscow.

  • Documented act or statuteGosplan set physical output targets for the entire union economy from Moscow.
  • Documented act or statuteThe 1936 constitution granted republics a formal right of secession that had no mechanism and was never exercised.

GOP · SC 00

Coded at zero: federalist in doctrine and centralising in practice on the issues it prioritises.

  • Programme textStates' rights invoked on education and health, while federal preemption is sought on immigration enforcement and energy permitting.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Stalinism

1928–1953 · USSR

Forced industrialisation and collectivisation under a single leader identified with the party, the state and history itself.

US Republican Party

1854– · United States

Limited federal government, lower taxes, strong defence, religious and family traditionalism, gun rights.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas