Atlas / Comparisons / Pinochet Regime vs UK Labour Party

Pinochet Regime and UK Labour Party

Measured distance across six axes

27.2 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisPinochet RegimeUK Labour PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+09−0312DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+08−0513DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+10−0313DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+07+034DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+05−0510DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+04−0812DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Pinochet Regime · EC +09

Among the deepest market liberalisations attempted anywhere, executed under a military government.

  • Documented act or statutePensions were transferred to private individual accounts in 1981.
  • Documented act or statuteState enterprises, health and schooling were privatised or voucherised through the late 1970s and 1980s.

UK Labour Party · EC −03

Coded −3. The 1983 manifesto would have been coded near −8, which is the single largest party movement recorded here.

  • Programme textClause IV, committing the party to common ownership, was rewritten in 1995.
  • Programme textCurrent commitments include public ownership of rail and a publicly owned energy company within an otherwise market economy.

Pinochet Regime · CU +08

Social order restored by decree alongside the economic liberalisation.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 1980 constitution was drafted by an appointed commission and ratified under a state of siege with no electoral register.
  • Documented act or statuteAbortion, legal in some circumstances since 1931, was banned outright in 1989.

UK Labour Party · CU −05

Coded −5: liberal on social questions with recent qualification on gender recognition.

  • Documented act or statuteIntroduced civil partnerships in 2004 and the Equality Act in 2010; equal marriage passed in 2013 with its support.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Pinochet Regime

1973–1990 · Chile

Free-market restructuring imposed by a military junta after the violent overthrow of an elected government.

UK Labour Party

1900– · Britain

Growth first, public service investment, workers' rights, stability and fiscal credibility.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas