Atlas / Comparisons / Pinochet Regime vs Putinism
Pinochet Regime and Putinism
Measured distance across six axes
The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID. No axis separates them by eight points or more.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Pinochet Regime | United Russia, sovereign democracy | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | +09 | +03 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | +08 | +09 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| AU · Organisation of power | +10 | +10 | 0 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| SC · Scale of decision | +07 | +09 | 2 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| ID · Rule of membership | +05 | +08 | 3 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| CH · Method and tempo | +04 | −03 | 7 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Pinochet Regime · CH +04
Coded positive but below the interwar cases: a single seizure followed by seventeen years of institutionalised rule.
- Documented act or statutePower was taken by aerial bombardment of the presidential palace in September 1973.
- Documented act or statuteThe regime accepted the result of the 1988 plebiscite and left office in 1990, which holds the score down.
United Russia, sovereign democracy · CH −03
Coded negative domestically: the regime is the established order and its change is conservative.
- Documented act or statuteConstitutional amendment by managed plebiscite rather than by rupture.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
Pinochet Regime
1973–1990 · Chile
Free-market restructuring imposed by a military junta after the violent overthrow of an elected government.
Putinism
2000– · Russia
A strong personalised state restoring great-power status, with traditional values against a decadent West.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas