Atlas / Comparisons / Neoliberalism vs Pinochet Regime

Neoliberalism and Pinochet Regime

Measured distance across six axes

17.4 / 49.0 possible

Different families with real common ground. They agree within three points on EC. They diverge by eight points or more on AU.

Axis by axis

AxisMont Pèlerin, ChicagoPinochet RegimeGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+09+090AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order+01+087DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
AU · Organisation of power−02+1012DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+02+075DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership−02+057DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo−02+046DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Mont Pèlerin, Chicago · AU −02

Coded slightly negative: the doctrine constrains majorities through rules and independent bodies, which disperses rather than concentrates authority.

  • ScholarshipCentral bank independence, fiscal rules and treaty commitments remove decisions from ordinary majority revision.
  • ScholarshipThis is delegation, not concentration; the entry for technocratic centrism is coded positive on the same reasoning and separates the two.

Pinochet Regime · AU +10

At the ceiling. Congress dissolved, parties banned, opposition disappeared.

  • Documented act or statuteCongress was dissolved and parties banned by decree after the September 1973 coup.
  • Documented act or statuteThe Rettig and Valech commissions documented over three thousand killed or disappeared and tens of thousands tortured.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Neoliberalism

1947– · International

Market competition as the organising principle of policy, insulated from democratic interference by rules and independent institutions.

Pinochet Regime

1973–1990 · Chile

Free-market restructuring imposed by a military junta after the violent overthrow of an elected government.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas