Atlas / Comparisons / Islamic State vs US Republican Party

Islamic State and US Republican Party

Measured distance across six axes

19.4 / 49.0 possible

Different families with real common ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on SC, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisISIS / DaeshGOPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+01+065DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+10+064DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
AU · Organisation of power+10+037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
SC · Scale of decision+09 009DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership+10+046DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo+10−0313DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

ISIS / Daesh · SC +09

Coded +9: a caliphate claiming authority over all Muslims everywhere.

  • Programme textThe 2014 declaration nullified the legitimacy of all other governments and organisations.

GOP · SC 00

Coded at zero: federalist in doctrine and centralising in practice on the issues it prioritises.

  • Programme textStates' rights invoked on education and health, while federal preemption is sought on immigration enforcement and energy permitting.

ISIS / Daesh · CH +10

At the ceiling: mass violence as constitutive rather than instrumental.

  • Documented act or statutePublic executions and their filming were a central instrument of governance and recruitment.

GOP · CH −03

Coded strongly incremental at the institutional level: the party operates through courts, legislatures and elections.

  • Documented act or statuteIts most consequential recent victories were achieved through judicial appointment and state legislation.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Islamic State

2013– · Iraq, Syria

Restoration of a universal caliphate through mass violence, with obligatory allegiance and death for dissent.

US Republican Party

1854– · United States

Limited federal government, lower taxes, strong defence, religious and family traditionalism, gun rights.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas