Atlas / Comparisons / Institutional Revolutionary Party vs UK Labour Party

Institutional Revolutionary Party and UK Labour Party

Measured distance across six axes

17.7 / 49.0 possible

Different families with real common ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisPRIUK Labour PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+01−034DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+04−059DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+08−0311DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+07+034DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+03−058DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−04−084DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

PRI · CU +04

Coded +4: revolutionary anticlericalism succeeded by a conservative corporatist order.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 1917 constitution's anticlerical articles were softened by amendment in 1992.

UK Labour Party · CU −05

Coded −5: liberal on social questions with recent qualification on gender recognition.

  • Documented act or statuteIntroduced civil partnerships in 2004 and the Equality Act in 2010; equal marriage passed in 2013 with its support.

PRI · AU +08

Coded +8: elections held without interruption and never lost for seventy-one years.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 1988 result was declared after a computer failure that destroyed the ballots, later admitted by the incumbent president.
  • Documented act or statuteThe party lost the presidency in 2000 and conceded, which is why this is not higher.

UK Labour Party · AU −03

Coded −3: constitutional in method with a centralising executive record in office.

  • Documented act or statuteDevolution to Scotland, Wales and London was created by the 1997 government.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Institutional Revolutionary Party

1929– · Mexico

A party built to institutionalise a revolution and end military coups, which then held the presidency for seventy-one consecutive years.

UK Labour Party

1900– · Britain

Growth first, public service investment, workers' rights, stability and fiscal credibility.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas