Atlas / Comparisons / Institutional Revolutionary Party vs Stalinism

Institutional Revolutionary Party and Stalinism

Measured distance across six axes

16.7 / 49.0 possible

Different families with real common ground. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisPRISocialism in one countryGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+01−1011DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+04+031AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+08+102AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+103AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+03+030AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−04+0812DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

PRI · EC +01

Coded +1: the same party redistributed land, nationalised oil and then signed NAFTA and privatised.

  • Documented act or statuteOil was nationalised in 1938; the banks were nationalised in 1982 and reprivatised from 1991.
  • Documented act or statuteNAFTA entered force in 1994 under a PRI president.

Socialism in one country · EC −10

Private ownership of productive assets was eliminated outright and allocation was set by physical plan targets rather than prices.

  • Documented act or statuteThe first Five-Year Plan from 1928 placed all industry under state ownership and central targets.
  • Documented act or statuteCollectivisation from 1929 abolished private farming; roughly a quarter of a million households were deported as kulaks.

PRI · CH −04

Coded −4: built specifically to institutionalise a revolution and stop the coups that followed it.

  • ScholarshipFounded in 1929 after the assassination of a president-elect, to route succession through a party rather than through the army.

Socialism in one country · CH +08

Coded high but below the Bolshevik score: this was transformation by state administrative violence rather than by insurrection.

  • Documented act or statuteCollectivisation and the industrialisation drive were imposed by decree and armed requisition between 1929 and 1933.
  • ScholarshipThe 1932–33 famine in Ukraine and Kazakhstan followed grain procurement quotas maintained during crop failure.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Institutional Revolutionary Party

1929– · Mexico

A party built to institutionalise a revolution and end military coups, which then held the presidency for seventy-one consecutive years.

Stalinism

1928–1953 · USSR

Forced industrialisation and collectivisation under a single leader identified with the party, the state and history itself.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas