Atlas / Comparisons / Peronism vs UK Conservative Party

Peronism and UK Conservative Party

Measured distance across six axes

13.7 / 49.0 possible

Different families with real common ground. They agree within three points on CU, SC, ID. They diverge by eight points or more on EC.

Axis by axis

AxisJusticialismToriesGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05+0611DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+03+052AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+06+024DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
SC · Scale of decision+06+033AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+04+031AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo+01−056DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justicialism · EC −05

Coded −5 for the 1946–55 governments specifically; the movement as a whole spans fourteen points and is the reason Menemism and Kirchnerism are separate entries.

  • Documented act or statuteRailways, telephones and the central bank were nationalised between 1946 and 1948.
  • Documented act or statuteReal wages rose sharply in the first term through state-backed collective bargaining.

Tories · EC +06

Coded +6 today. The same party in 1975 supported nationalised rail, coal, steel and utilities and would have been coded near −2.

  • Documented act or statutePrivatisation of telecoms, gas, water, electricity and rail between 1984 and 1996.
  • Programme textThe 1970 and February 1974 manifestos accepted the nationalised industries as settled.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Peronism

1946– · Argentina

Social justice, economic independence and political sovereignty, delivered by a leader speaking directly for the shirtless masses.

UK Conservative Party

1834– · Britain

Fiscal restraint, national sovereignty, property ownership, controlled migration, gradualism.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas