Atlas / Comparisons / Peronism vs Social Liberalism

Peronism and Social Liberalism

Measured distance across six axes

21.5 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisJusticialismRawlsian liberalismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05+016DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+03−069DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+06−0612DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+06+024DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+04−0711DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+01−078DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justicialism · CU +03

Coded mildly traditional: women's suffrage and social rights alongside a Catholic corporatist frame.

  • Documented act or statuteWomen received the vote in 1947 and a women's branch of the party was created.
  • Documented act or statuteDivorce was legalised in 1954 during the conflict with the church and repealed after the 1955 coup.

Rawlsian liberalism · CU −06

Coded −6: equal basic liberties as lexically prior to everything else.

  • Programme textThe first principle of justice takes priority over the distributive one in Rawls's ordering.

Justicialism · AU +06

Coded +6: elected, and hostile to the institutions that could check it.

  • Documented act or statuteThe supreme court was impeached and replaced in 1947; the main opposition newspaper was expropriated in 1951.

Rawlsian liberalism · AU −06

Coded −6: entrenched rights and judicial review.

  • Programme textThe framework places basic liberties beyond ordinary majority revision.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Peronism

1946– · Argentina

Social justice, economic independence and political sovereignty, delivered by a leader speaking directly for the shirtless masses.

Social Liberalism

1971– · Global North

Equal basic liberties first, then fair equality of opportunity, then inequalities only where they benefit the worst off.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas