Atlas / Comparisons / Peronism vs Institutional Revolutionary Party

Peronism and Institutional Revolutionary Party

Measured distance across six axes

8.2 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisJusticialismPRIGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05+016DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+03+041AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+06+082AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+06+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+04+031AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo+01−045DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justicialism · EC −05

Coded −5 for the 1946–55 governments specifically; the movement as a whole spans fourteen points and is the reason Menemism and Kirchnerism are separate entries.

  • Documented act or statuteRailways, telephones and the central bank were nationalised between 1946 and 1948.
  • Documented act or statuteReal wages rose sharply in the first term through state-backed collective bargaining.

PRI · EC +01

Coded +1: the same party redistributed land, nationalised oil and then signed NAFTA and privatised.

  • Documented act or statuteOil was nationalised in 1938; the banks were nationalised in 1982 and reprivatised from 1991.
  • Documented act or statuteNAFTA entered force in 1994 under a PRI president.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Peronism

1946– · Argentina

Social justice, economic independence and political sovereignty, delivered by a leader speaking directly for the shirtless masses.

Institutional Revolutionary Party

1929– · Mexico

A party built to institutionalise a revolution and end military coups, which then held the presidency for seventy-one consecutive years.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas