Atlas / Comparisons / Orbánism vs US Democratic Party

Orbánism and US Democratic Party

Measured distance across six axes

22.3 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on SC. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisFideszUS Democratic PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04−037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+08−0513DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+07−029DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+06+042AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+07−0613DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−01−065DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Fidesz · CU +08

Coded +8: Christian national identity written into the constitution and into family and education law.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2011 Fundamental Law defines marriage as between a man and a woman and invokes Christianity in its preamble.
  • Documented act or statuteA 2021 law restricted depiction of homosexuality and gender reassignment to minors.

US Democratic Party · CU −05

Coded −5: the party has moved substantially toward the liberal pole on family and identity questions since 2004.

  • Programme textPlatform support for same-sex marriage moved from opposition to endorsement between 2004 and 2012.
  • Comparative datasetCHES-equivalent placements put the party well toward the GAL pole relative to European mainstream parties.

Fidesz · AU +07

The reference case for the entry. Elections are real and the institutions that could reverse their outcome have been restructured.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2011 constitution and subsequent amendments restructured the constitutional court and the judicial appointment system.
  • Documented act or statuteThe 2018 consolidation of some four hundred outlets into a single foundation removed most independent broadcast and print media.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

US Democratic Party · AU −02

Negative but not strongly so: the party has expanded federal authority repeatedly while defending procedural constraints on it.

  • Programme textSupported statutory federal standards for election administration in 2021–22.
  • Documented act or statuteParty leadership declined to abolish the legislative filibuster in 2022 despite holding a majority.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Orbánism

2010– · Hungary

Explicitly 'illiberal democracy': majority rule unconstrained by liberal checks, Christian national identity, opposition to immigration.

US Democratic Party

1828– · United States

Regulated capitalism, expanded health coverage, civil rights, climate action, and defence of existing institutional procedure.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas