Atlas / Comparisons / Orbánism vs National Rally

Orbánism and National Rally

Measured distance across six axes

6.6 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisFideszRN, Front NationalGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04−015DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+080AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+07+043AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+06+033AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+07+070AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−01−010AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Fidesz · EC +04

Coded mildly market: a flat income tax alongside large family transfers and sectoral taxes on foreign firms.

  • Documented act or statuteA fifteen percent flat personal income tax with income tax exemption for mothers of four or more children.
  • Documented act or statuteSector-specific taxes applied principally to foreign-owned banking, retail and telecoms.

RN, Front National · EC −01

Moved from a market position in the 1980s to a protectionist and pro-welfare position, which is why it now sits near the centre.

  • Programme textOpposition to raising the pension age and support for price controls on energy and food staples.
  • Comparative datasetCHES records a substantial leftward movement in radical right economic positioning across recent waves.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Orbánism

2010– · Hungary

Explicitly 'illiberal democracy': majority rule unconstrained by liberal checks, Christian national identity, opposition to immigration.

National Rally

1972– · France

National priority for French citizens, sharp restriction of immigration, sovereignty against the EU, protection of purchasing power.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas