Atlas / Comparisons / Orbánism vs Peronism

Orbánism and Peronism

Measured distance across six axes

11.0 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on AU, SC, ID, CH. They diverge by eight points or more on EC.

Axis by axis

AxisFideszJusticialismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04−059DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+035DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
AU · Organisation of power+07+061AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+06+060AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+07+043AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−01+012AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Fidesz · EC +04

Coded mildly market: a flat income tax alongside large family transfers and sectoral taxes on foreign firms.

  • Documented act or statuteA fifteen percent flat personal income tax with income tax exemption for mothers of four or more children.
  • Documented act or statuteSector-specific taxes applied principally to foreign-owned banking, retail and telecoms.

Justicialism · EC −05

Coded −5 for the 1946–55 governments specifically; the movement as a whole spans fourteen points and is the reason Menemism and Kirchnerism are separate entries.

  • Documented act or statuteRailways, telephones and the central bank were nationalised between 1946 and 1948.
  • Documented act or statuteReal wages rose sharply in the first term through state-backed collective bargaining.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Orbánism

2010– · Hungary

Explicitly 'illiberal democracy': majority rule unconstrained by liberal checks, Christian national identity, opposition to immigration.

Peronism

1946– · Argentina

Social justice, economic independence and political sovereignty, delivered by a leader speaking directly for the shirtless masses.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas