Atlas / Comparisons / Nordic Social Democracy vs Social Liberalism

Nordic Social Democracy and Social Liberalism

Measured distance across six axes

6.8 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisFolkhemmetRawlsian liberalismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05+016DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order−06−060AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power−06−060AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+02+020AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership−04−073AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−08−071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Folkhemmet · EC −05

Very high redistribution inside a very open market economy. The transfer level pulls left, the ownership and trade regime pulls right.

  • Documented act or statuteSweden has no wealth tax since 2007 and no inheritance tax since 2004.
  • Documented act or statutePublicly funded school vouchers admit for-profit private providers.

2 more artefacts on the full entry →

Rawlsian liberalism · EC +01

Coded +1: market economy with substantial redistribution.

  • Programme textA Theory of Justice (1971) permits inequality only where it benefits the least advantaged.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Nordic Social Democracy

1932– · Sweden, Norway, Denmark

Universal welfare, full employment and centralised wage bargaining, inside a market economy and a liberal constitution.

Social Liberalism

1971– · Global North

Equal basic liberties first, then fair equality of opportunity, then inequalities only where they benefit the worst off.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas