Atlas / Comparisons / Minarchist Libertarianism vs Thatcherism

Minarchist Libertarianism and Thatcherism

Measured distance across six axes

20.3 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on EC. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, SC.

Axis by axis

AxisNozick, LPThatcherismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+10+091AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order−03+069DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−08+0210DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision−07+0512DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−04+037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo−03+036DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Nozick, LP · CU −03

Coded −3: socially permissive by construction.

  • Programme textUS Libertarian Party platform has supported drug legalisation, same-sex marriage and free expression since the 1970s.

Thatcherism · CU +06

Coded +6: an explicit programme of moral restoration alongside the economic one.

  • Documented act or statuteSection 28, enacted in 1988, prohibited local authorities from promoting homosexuality.

Nozick, LP · AU −08

Coded −8: strict constitutional limits and civil liberties.

  • Programme textThe US party platform has opposed surveillance, conscription and drug prohibition since 1972.

Thatcherism · AU +02

Coded +2: parliamentary throughout, with a sharply strengthened central executive.

  • Documented act or statuteTrade union legislation between 1980 and 1990 progressively restricted secondary action and required ballots.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Minarchist Libertarianism

1971– · United States, worldwide

A night-watchman state limited to police, courts and defence; maximum personal and economic freedom otherwise.

Thatcherism

1979–1990 · Britain

Roll back the state, break union power, sell public assets, restore the authority of law, order and family.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas