Atlas / Comparisons / Classical Marxism vs Minarchist Libertarianism

Classical Marxism and Minarchist Libertarianism

Measured distance across six axes

27.9 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on CU. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, AU, SC, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisScientific socialismNozick, LPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−10+1020DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order−06−033AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+02−0810DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+04−0711DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−09−045DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo+08−0311DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Scientific socialism · EC −10

At the floor: abolition of private property in the means of production.

  • Programme textThe Manifesto states the theory of the communists in a single sentence: abolition of private property.

Nozick, LP · EC +10

At the market pole: police, courts and defence only.

  • Programme textNozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) derives a night-watchman state and no more.

Scientific socialism · AU +02

Coded +2: a transitional dictatorship of the proletariat theorised as majority rule, followed by the withering away of the state.

  • Programme textThe Critique of the Gotha Programme names a transitional period; Engels' Anti-Dühring describes the state dying out.
  • ScholarshipThe gap between that endpoint and every regime built in its name is the most important discontinuity in this dataset.

Nozick, LP · AU −08

Coded −8: strict constitutional limits and civil liberties.

  • Programme textThe US party platform has opposed surveillance, conscription and drug prohibition since 1972.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Classical Marxism

1848–1914 · Germany, Europe

History driven by class struggle; capitalism generates its own gravediggers; proletarian revolution abolishes classes and eventually the state.

Minarchist Libertarianism

1971– · United States, worldwide

A night-watchman state limited to police, courts and defence; maximum personal and economic freedom otherwise.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas