Atlas / Comparisons / Maoism vs US Democratic Party
Maoism and US Democratic Party
Measured distance across six axes
Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on CU. They diverge by eight points or more on AU, ID, CH.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Mao Zedong Thought | US Democratic Party | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | −10 | −03 | 7 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | −02 | −05 | 3 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| AU · Organisation of power | +10 | −02 | 12 | Diverges | Carries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this. |
| SC · Scale of decision | +09 | +04 | 5 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| ID · Rule of membership | +04 | −06 | 10 | Diverges | Carries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this. |
| CH · Method and tempo | +10 | −06 | 16 | Diverges | Carries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Mao Zedong Thought · AU +10
At the ceiling, with the distinctive feature that the party's own institutions were destroyed from above and below.
- Documented act or statuteThe head of state was purged and died in detention in 1969 without trial.
US Democratic Party · AU −02
Negative but not strongly so: the party has expanded federal authority repeatedly while defending procedural constraints on it.
- Programme textSupported statutory federal standards for election administration in 2021–22.
- Documented act or statuteParty leadership declined to abolish the legislative filibuster in 2022 despite holding a majority.
Mao Zedong Thought · ID +04
Coded moderately positive: class background was hereditary in practice and determined life chances.
- ScholarshipClass labels assigned in the land reform were inherited and governed schooling, marriage and employment for decades.
US Democratic Party · ID −06
Universalist on the formal membership rule.
- Programme textPlatform commitments to a path to citizenship for long-resident undocumented migrants have appeared in every cycle since 2004.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
Maoism
1949–1976 · China
Peasant-based revolution, continuous class struggle after the seizure of power, permanent mobilisation against the party's own institutions.
US Democratic Party
1828– · United States
Regulated capitalism, expanded health coverage, civil rights, climate action, and defence of existing institutional procedure.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas