Atlas / Comparisons / Maoism vs UK Labour Party

Maoism and UK Labour Party

Measured distance across six axes

25.8 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on CU. They diverge by eight points or more on AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisMao Zedong ThoughtUK Labour PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−10−037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order−02−053AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+10−0313DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+09+036DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+04−059DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+10−0818DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Mao Zedong Thought · AU +10

At the ceiling, with the distinctive feature that the party's own institutions were destroyed from above and below.

  • Documented act or statuteThe head of state was purged and died in detention in 1969 without trial.

UK Labour Party · AU −03

Coded −3: constitutional in method with a centralising executive record in office.

  • Documented act or statuteDevolution to Scotland, Wales and London was created by the 1997 government.

Mao Zedong Thought · ID +04

Coded moderately positive: class background was hereditary in practice and determined life chances.

  • ScholarshipClass labels assigned in the land reform were inherited and governed schooling, marriage and employment for decades.

UK Labour Party · ID −05

Coded −5: civic membership with a restrictive recent posture on migration numbers.

  • Programme textCommitments to reduce net migration while defending settled status and asylum obligations.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Maoism

1949–1976 · China

Peasant-based revolution, continuous class struggle after the seizure of power, permanent mobilisation against the party's own institutions.

UK Labour Party

1900– · Britain

Growth first, public service investment, workers' rights, stability and fiscal credibility.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas