Atlas / Comparisons / Juche vs US Democratic Party

Juche and US Democratic Party

Measured distance across six axes

26.4 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisKimilsungismUS Democratic PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−10−037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+09−0514DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+10−0212DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+10+046DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+10−0616DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−02−064DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Kimilsungism · CU +09

At the traditional pole: a hereditary leader cult and a hierarchical social order with no autonomous association.

  • Programme textThe Ten Principles for the Establishment of the One-Ideology System govern private conduct including speech within families.

US Democratic Party · CU −05

Coded −5: the party has moved substantially toward the liberal pole on family and identity questions since 2004.

  • Programme textPlatform support for same-sex marriage moved from opposition to endorsement between 2004 and 2012.
  • Comparative datasetCHES-equivalent placements put the party well toward the GAL pole relative to European mainstream parties.

Kimilsungism · AU +10

At the ceiling with hereditary succession, which no other communist state institutionalised.

  • Documented act or statuteThree hereditary successions since 1948.
  • Documented act or statuteThe songbun system assigns life chances by inherited political classification.

US Democratic Party · AU −02

Negative but not strongly so: the party has expanded federal authority repeatedly while defending procedural constraints on it.

  • Programme textSupported statutory federal standards for election administration in 2021–22.
  • Documented act or statuteParty leadership declined to abolish the legislative filibuster in 2022 despite holding a majority.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Juche

1955– · North Korea

National self-reliance under a hereditary leader treated as the source of all social life; military-first priority.

US Democratic Party

1828– · United States

Regulated capitalism, expanded health coverage, civil rights, climate action, and defence of existing institutional procedure.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas