Atlas / Comparisons / Juche vs Social Liberalism

Juche and Social Liberalism

Measured distance across six axes

31.3 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, AU, SC, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisKimilsungismRawlsian liberalismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−10+0111DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+09−0615DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+10−0616DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+10+028DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership+10−0717DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−02−075DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Kimilsungism · EC −10

At the floor. State ownership of everything, with unofficial markets tolerated because the ration system failed.

  • ScholarshipThe public distribution system collapsed during the 1994–98 famine; jangmadang markets emerged and are now taxed rather than suppressed.

Rawlsian liberalism · EC +01

Coded +1: market economy with substantial redistribution.

  • Programme textA Theory of Justice (1971) permits inequality only where it benefits the least advantaged.

Kimilsungism · CU +09

At the traditional pole: a hereditary leader cult and a hierarchical social order with no autonomous association.

  • Programme textThe Ten Principles for the Establishment of the One-Ideology System govern private conduct including speech within families.

Rawlsian liberalism · CU −06

Coded −6: equal basic liberties as lexically prior to everything else.

  • Programme textThe first principle of justice takes priority over the distributive one in Rawls's ordering.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Juche

1955– · North Korea

National self-reliance under a hereditary leader treated as the source of all social life; military-first priority.

Social Liberalism

1971– · Global North

Equal basic liberties first, then fair equality of opportunity, then inequalities only where they benefit the worst off.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas