Atlas / Comparisons / Hamas vs Stalinism
Hamas and Stalinism
Measured distance across six axes
Different families with real common ground. They agree within three points on AU, CH. They diverge by eight points or more on EC.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Hamas | Socialism in one country | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | −02 | −10 | 8 | Diverges | Carries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | +09 | +03 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| AU · Organisation of power | +09 | +10 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| SC · Scale of decision | +04 | +10 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| ID · Rule of membership | +09 | +03 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CH · Method and tempo | +08 | +08 | 0 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Hamas · EC −02
Coded −2: welfare and clinic networks funded externally with no productive programme.
- ScholarshipSocial service networks operate alongside taxation of trade and external transfers.
Socialism in one country · EC −10
Private ownership of productive assets was eliminated outright and allocation was set by physical plan targets rather than prices.
- Documented act or statuteThe first Five-Year Plan from 1928 placed all industry under state ownership and central targets.
- Documented act or statuteCollectivisation from 1929 abolished private farming; roughly a quarter of a million households were deported as kulaks.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
Hamas
1987– · Gaza, West Bank
Armed Palestinian nationalism in an Islamist frame, rejecting the negotiated framework in favour of resistance.
Stalinism
1928–1953 · USSR
Forced industrialisation and collectivisation under a single leader identified with the party, the state and history itself.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas