Atlas / Comparisons / Global Greens vs Saudi Religious Monarchy

Global Greens and Saudi Religious Monarchy

Measured distance across six axes

32.6 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. They agree within three points on CH. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, AU, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisGlobal GreensSaudi Religious MonarchyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05+0510DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order−09+1019DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−06+1016DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision 00+077DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership−08+0917DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−04−073AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Global Greens · EC −05

Coded −5: ecological regulation and public investment rather than public ownership.

  • Programme textThe 2001 Charter commits to markets constrained by ecological limits rather than to their abolition.

Saudi Religious Monarchy · EC +05

Coded mildly market: a state oil monopoly financing very large transfers alongside an otherwise private commercial economy.

  • Documented act or statuteSaudi Aramco remains majority state-owned with a minority public listing since 2019.

Global Greens · CU −09

Coded −9: respect for diversity is one of the six founding principles.

  • Programme textThe Charter commits to gender equity, indigenous rights and cultural diversity as core rather than adjacent.

Saudi Religious Monarchy · CU +10

At the ceiling: religious authority over public conduct, with substantial relaxation since 2017.

  • Documented act or statuteThe driving ban on women was lifted in 2018 and the religious police lost arrest powers in 2016.
  • Documented act or statuteMale guardianship requirements were reduced from 2019 but not abolished.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Global Greens

2001– · Worldwide

Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.

Saudi Religious Monarchy

1932– · Saudi Arabia

Dynastic rule legitimated by a strict religious establishment; no parties, no elections, no constitution other than scripture.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas