Atlas / Comparisons / Global Greens vs Stalinism

Global Greens and Stalinism

Measured distance across six axes

28.1 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisGlobal GreensSocialism in one countryGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05−105DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order−09+0312DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−06+1016DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision 00+1010DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−08+0311DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−04+0812DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Global Greens · CU −09

Coded −9: respect for diversity is one of the six founding principles.

  • Programme textThe Charter commits to gender equity, indigenous rights and cultural diversity as core rather than adjacent.

Socialism in one country · CU +03

Coded positive despite Bolshevik origins because the regime reversed its own cultural programme after 1934.

  • Documented act or statuteAbortion was recriminalised in 1936 and divorce made difficult; the 1936 constitution celebrated the family.
  • Documented act or statuteMale homosexuality was recriminalised in 1934.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

Global Greens · AU −06

Coded strongly negative: rotation, mandates and referenda were founding organisational commitments, not later additions.

  • Programme textThe 2001 Global Greens Charter names participatory democracy as one of six principles.
  • Documented act or statuteDie Grünen operated office rotation and imperative mandates in its early parliamentary practice.

Socialism in one country · AU +10

The party itself was destroyed as an autonomous body, which places this above ordinary one-party rule.

  • Documented act or statuteOf the 1934 Central Committee, roughly two-thirds were shot within four years.
  • Documented act or statuteFactions had been banned inside the party since 1921; by 1937 mere association was capital.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Global Greens

2001– · Worldwide

Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.

Stalinism

1928–1953 · USSR

Forced industrialisation and collectivisation under a single leader identified with the party, the state and history itself.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas