Atlas / Comparisons / Global Greens vs Social Liberalism
Global Greens and Social Liberalism
Measured distance across six axes
The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Global Greens | Rawlsian liberalism | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | −05 | +01 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | −09 | −06 | 3 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| AU · Organisation of power | −06 | −06 | 0 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| SC · Scale of decision | 00 | +02 | 2 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| ID · Rule of membership | −08 | −07 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| CH · Method and tempo | −04 | −07 | 3 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Global Greens · EC −05
Coded −5: ecological regulation and public investment rather than public ownership.
- Programme textThe 2001 Charter commits to markets constrained by ecological limits rather than to their abolition.
Rawlsian liberalism · EC +01
Coded +1: market economy with substantial redistribution.
- Programme textA Theory of Justice (1971) permits inequality only where it benefits the least advantaged.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
Global Greens
2001– · Worldwide
Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.
Social Liberalism
1971– · Global North
Equal basic liberties first, then fair equality of opportunity, then inequalities only where they benefit the worst off.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas