Atlas / Comparisons / Global Greens vs Khomeinism

Global Greens and Khomeinism

Measured distance across six axes

32.6 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. They agree within three points on EC. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisGlobal GreensVelayat-e faqihGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−05−032AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order−09+1019DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−06+0915DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision 00+088DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−08+0917DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−04+0711DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Global Greens · CU −09

Coded −9: respect for diversity is one of the six founding principles.

  • Programme textThe Charter commits to gender equity, indigenous rights and cultural diversity as core rather than adjacent.

Velayat-e faqih · CU +10

At the ceiling: compulsory dress, gender segregation and clerical authority over personal law.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2022–23 protests followed a death in morality police custody and were met with mass arrests and executions.

Global Greens · AU −06

Coded strongly negative: rotation, mandates and referenda were founding organisational commitments, not later additions.

  • Programme textThe 2001 Global Greens Charter names participatory democracy as one of six principles.
  • Documented act or statuteDie Grünen operated office rotation and imperative mandates in its early parliamentary practice.

Velayat-e faqih · AU +09

A genuine hybrid: real contested elections inside a hard unelected ceiling. Coded 9 rather than 10 for that reason.

  • Documented act or statuteThe Guardian Council vets all candidates and disqualified the majority of applicants in recent parliamentary cycles.
  • Documented act or statuteThe Supreme Leader is selected by an Assembly of Experts whose own candidates are vetted by the Guardian Council he appoints.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Global Greens

2001– · Worldwide

Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.

Khomeinism

1979– · Iran

Guardianship of the jurist: sovereignty belongs to God and is exercised by a supreme clerical authority over an elected government.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas