Atlas / Comparisons / American Fusionist Conservatism vs Neoliberalism
American Fusionist Conservatism and Neoliberalism
Measured distance across six axes
The same broad family. They agree within three points on EC, AU. No axis separates them by eight points or more.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Buckley, Meyer | Mont Pèlerin, Chicago | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | +08 | +09 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | +06 | +01 | 5 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| AU · Organisation of power | −04 | −02 | 2 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| SC · Scale of decision | −04 | +02 | 6 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| ID · Rule of membership | +03 | −02 | 5 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CH · Method and tempo | −06 | −02 | 4 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Buckley, Meyer · SC −04
Coded −4: federalism domestically, and interventionism abroad.
- ScholarshipThe tension between limited government at home and global containment abroad was never resolved.
Mont Pèlerin, Chicago · SC +02
Coded mildly central: supranational rules and treaty commitments are a central instrument.
- Documented act or statuteTrade and investment liberalisation operates through binding multilateral agreement.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
American Fusionist Conservatism
1955–2000 · United States
Free markets, traditional morality and anti-communism fused into one movement; liberty as the political means to a virtuous end.
Neoliberalism
1947– · International
Market competition as the organising principle of policy, insulated from democratic interference by rules and independent institutions.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas