Atlas / Comparisons / American Fusionist Conservatism vs Mensheviks

American Fusionist Conservatism and Mensheviks

Measured distance across six axes

24.3 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on AU. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisBuckley, MeyerRSDLP(m)GapReading
EC · Economic organisation+08−0816DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order+06−0511DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−04−040AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision−04+037DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+03−0710DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−06+028DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Buckley, Meyer · EC +08

Coded +8: free markets treated as morally rather than merely technically superior.

  • Programme textFrank Meyer's In Defense of Freedom argues liberty is the political precondition of virtue.

RSDLP(m) · EC −08

Coded within one point of the Bolsheviks: the disagreement was about sequence and method, not about ownership.

  • Programme textBoth factions accepted the same Second Congress programme of 1903 on socialisation of the means of production.

Buckley, Meyer · CU +06

Coded +6: traditional morality as the end that liberty serves.

  • Programme textNational Review's founding statement in 1955 declared it stood athwart history yelling stop.

RSDLP(m) · CU −05

Shared the Bolshevik cultural programme; the split was never about social questions.

  • Programme textBoth factions campaigned on universal suffrage including for women, civil marriage and secular schooling.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

American Fusionist Conservatism

1955–2000 · United States

Free markets, traditional morality and anti-communism fused into one movement; liberty as the political means to a virtuous end.

Mensheviks

1903–1921 · Russia

Russia must pass through a bourgeois-democratic stage; socialism cannot be decreed by a minority.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas