Atlas / Comparisons / US Democratic Socialism vs Hamas

US Democratic Socialism and Hamas

Measured distance across six axes

30.1 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. They agree within three points on SC. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisDSA, Sanders wingHamasGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−06−024DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order−08+0917DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−04+0913DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+03+041AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership−08+0917DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo−04+0812DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

DSA, Sanders wing · CU −08

Coded −8: the movement's cultural positions are as central to it as its economics.

  • Programme textProgramme commitments on reproductive rights, trans health care, decarceration and immigration are foundational.

Hamas · CU +09

At the ceiling: religious authority over social life in the territory it governs.

  • Documented act or statuteDress and conduct regulations were imposed in Gaza after 2007.

DSA, Sanders wing · AU −04

Coded −4: strongly pro-democratisation of existing institutions rather than concentration.

  • Programme textCommitments to abolish the electoral college, expand voting rights and end the filibuster.

Hamas · AU +09

Coded +9: won an election and then held no other.

  • Documented act or statuteWon the 2006 legislative election, seized sole control of Gaza by force in 2007, and held no election in the following seventeen years.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

US Democratic Socialism

1982– · United States

Universal public provision funded by taxing concentrated wealth, achieved entirely through elections and unions.

Hamas

1987– · Gaza, West Bank

Armed Palestinian nationalism in an Islamist frame, rejecting the negotiated framework in favour of resistance.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas