Atlas / Comparisons / Degrowth vs Global Greens

Degrowth and Global Greens

Measured distance across six axes

9.3 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on EC, CU, AU, ID. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisDegrowthGlobal GreensGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−08−053AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order−07−092AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power−05−061AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision−06 006DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership−07−081AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo+02−046DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Degrowth · SC −06

Coded −6: subsidiarity and bioregional scale.

  • Programme textProposals favour relocalised production over global supply chains.

Global Greens · SC 00

Coded at zero: subsidiarity combined with binding international environmental agreement.

  • Programme textThe Charter commits simultaneously to local self-determination and to enforceable global governance on ecology.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Degrowth

2002– · Europe, Latin America

Planned reduction of material throughput in rich economies, with wellbeing decoupled from GDP.

Global Greens

2001– · Worldwide

Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas