Atlas / Comparisons / Castroism vs Maoism
Castroism and Maoism
Measured distance across six axes
Effectively the same position. They agree within three points on EC, CU, AU, SC, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.
Axis by axis
| Axis | Cuban Communism | Mao Zedong Thought | Gap | Reading | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC · Economic organisation | −09 | −10 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| CU · Social and cultural order | −01 | −02 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| AU · Organisation of power | +09 | +10 | 1 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| SC · Scale of decision | +09 | +09 | 0 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
| ID · Rule of membership | 00 | +04 | 4 | Differs | Real difference, but not the dividing line. |
| CH · Method and tempo | +07 | +10 | 3 | Agrees | Effectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about. |
Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →
The evidence behind the widest gaps
A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.
Cuban Communism · ID 00
Coded at zero: explicit internationalism and anti-racism doctrine with a Cuban national frame.
- Documented act or statuteSent hundreds of thousands of troops and medical personnel to Africa and Latin America from 1963.
Mao Zedong Thought · ID +04
Coded moderately positive: class background was hereditary in practice and determined life chances.
- ScholarshipClass labels assigned in the land reform were inherited and governed schooling, marriage and employment for decades.
What this comparison does not establish
Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.
Castroism
1959– · Cuba
Anti-imperial national sovereignty plus socialist transformation, led by a guerrilla-derived party-state.
Maoism
1949–1976 · China
Peasant-based revolution, continuous class struggle after the seizure of power, permanent mobilisation against the party's own institutions.
Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.
Open in the atlas