Atlas / Comparisons / Castroism vs Global Greens

Castroism and Global Greens

Measured distance across six axes

23.9 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisCuban CommunismGlobal GreensGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09−054DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order−01−098DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+09−0615DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+09 009DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership 00−088DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+07−0411DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Cuban Communism · CU −01

Coded −1: universal education and health alongside decades of persecution of homosexuals, later reversed.

  • Documented act or statuteGay men were sent to UMAP labour camps in the 1960s; same-sex marriage was legalised by referendum in 2022.

Global Greens · CU −09

Coded −9: respect for diversity is one of the six founding principles.

  • Programme textThe Charter commits to gender equity, indigenous rights and cultural diversity as core rather than adjacent.

Cuban Communism · AU +09

Coded +9: a single legal party with no competing candidates.

  • Documented act or statuteThe constitution names the Communist Party the superior guiding force of society and the state.

Global Greens · AU −06

Coded strongly negative: rotation, mandates and referenda were founding organisational commitments, not later additions.

  • Programme textThe 2001 Global Greens Charter names participatory democracy as one of six principles.
  • Documented act or statuteDie Grünen operated office rotation and imperative mandates in its early parliamentary practice.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Castroism

1959– · Cuba

Anti-imperial national sovereignty plus socialist transformation, led by a guerrilla-derived party-state.

Global Greens

2001– · Worldwide

Ecological wisdom, social justice, participatory democracy, non-violence, sustainability, respect for diversity.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas