Atlas / Comparisons / Bukelismo vs Social Liberalism

Bukelismo and Social Liberalism

Measured distance across six axes

23.5 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisNuevas IdeasRawlsian liberalismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+05+014DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+06−0612DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+08−0614DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+06+024DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+03−0710DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+02−079DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Nuevas Ideas · CU +06

Coded +6: a security-first social order with conservative positions on family policy.

  • Documented act or statuteGender studies content was removed from the public school curriculum in 2024.

Rawlsian liberalism · CU −06

Coded −6: equal basic liberties as lexically prior to everything else.

  • Programme textThe first principle of justice takes priority over the distributive one in Rawls's ordering.

Nuevas Ideas · AU +08

Elected with very high approval, and the constraints on the office removed one by one.

  • Documented act or statuteThe legislature removed the constitutional chamber judges and the attorney general in May 2021.
  • Documented act or statuteThe reconstituted court then permitted consecutive re-election despite an explicit constitutional prohibition.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

Rawlsian liberalism · AU −06

Coded −6: entrenched rights and judicial review.

  • Programme textThe framework places basic liberties beyond ordinary majority revision.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Bukelismo

2019– · El Salvador

Mass incarceration of suspected gang members under a permanent state of exception, sold as the trade of civil liberties for physical safety.

Social Liberalism

1971– · Global North

Equal basic liberties first, then fair equality of opportunity, then inequalities only where they benefit the worst off.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas