Atlas / Comparisons / Bolsheviks vs National Socialism

Bolsheviks and National Socialism

Measured distance across six axes

24.8 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on AU, SC, CH. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisRSDLP(b)NSDAPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09+0211DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order−05+0914DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+08+102AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+092AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership−07+1017DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+10+091AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

RSDLP(b) · EC −09

Banks, land and large industry were taken into state ownership within a year of the seizure of power.

  • Documented act or statuteThe Decree on Land abolished private landownership in November 1917.
  • Documented act or statuteBanks were nationalised in December 1917 and large-scale industry in June 1918.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

NSDAP · EC +02

Ownership stayed private and was pushed further private, while allocation was directed by the state for rearmament. That combination sits just right of the midpoint, not at either pole.

  • Programme textThe 1920 twenty-five point programme demanded nationalisation of trusts, profit-sharing and land expropriation without compensation.
  • Documented act or statuteHitler declared the programme unalterable in 1926 and none of its collectivist points were enacted.

2 more artefacts on the full entry →

RSDLP(b) · CU −05

Culturally radical in the first phase: the most permissive family and gender law then in existence anywhere.

  • Documented act or statuteDivorce on demand, civil marriage and the legalisation of abortion were introduced between 1917 and 1920.
  • Documented act or statuteThe criminalisation of homosexuality was removed with the tsarist code in 1922.

NSDAP · CU +09

Social order was to be reconstituted on racial hierarchy, with women's role restricted by policy and all autonomous civil association dissolved.

  • Documented act or statuteMarried women were pushed out of the professions from 1933 and awarded the Mother's Cross for childbearing from 1938.
  • Documented act or statuteYouth, professional and leisure organisations were merged into party bodies under the Gleichschaltung laws of 1933–34.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Bolsheviks

1903–1924 · Russia

A disciplined vanguard party seizes power in the name of the working class and imposes socialism from above.

National Socialism

1920–1945 · Germany

A racially defined national community, hierarchy by blood, conquest of living space, extermination of designated enemies.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas