Atlas / Comparisons / Bolsheviks vs Soviet Bureaucratic Socialism

Bolsheviks and Soviet Bureaucratic Socialism

Measured distance across six axes

20.7 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on EC, AU, SC. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisRSDLP(b)Brezhnev eraGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09−101AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order−05+049DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+08+091AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+103AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership−07+029DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+10−0616DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

RSDLP(b) · CU −05

Culturally radical in the first phase: the most permissive family and gender law then in existence anywhere.

  • Documented act or statuteDivorce on demand, civil marriage and the legalisation of abortion were introduced between 1917 and 1920.
  • Documented act or statuteThe criminalisation of homosexuality was removed with the tsarist code in 1922.

Brezhnev era · CU +04

Coded +4: a conservative social order under a nominally revolutionary doctrine.

  • Documented act or statuteHomosexuality remained criminal; religious practice was restricted; the family was celebrated in official culture.

RSDLP(b) · ID −07

Internationalist and class-based rather than national: membership was defined by relation to production, not descent.

  • Programme textThe Comintern was founded in 1919 on the premise that the revolution was not national.
  • Documented act or statuteCoded −7 rather than lower because 'former people' were disenfranchised by class origin in the 1918 constitution.

Brezhnev era · ID +02

Coded +2: formal internationalism alongside Russification and restrictions on Jewish emigration.

  • Documented act or statuteRussian was required in higher education across the republics; emigration required exit visas routinely refused.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Bolsheviks

1903–1924 · Russia

A disciplined vanguard party seizes power in the name of the working class and imposes socialism from above.

Soviet Bureaucratic Socialism

1964–1985 · USSR

Stability of cadres, guaranteed employment and subsidised necessities, in exchange for total political passivity.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas