Atlas / Comparisons / Apartheid Nationalism vs Orbánism

Apartheid Nationalism and Orbánism

Measured distance across six axes

6.2 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisNational PartyFideszGapReading
EC · Economic organisation 00+044DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+10+082AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+07+070AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+061AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+10+073AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo+02−013AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

National Party · EC 00

Coded at the centre, which surprises people in both directions: extensive state ownership and racially reserved employment inside a capitalist economy.

  • Documented act or statuteState corporations dominated steel, electricity, transport, oil and armaments.
  • Documented act or statuteJob reservation statutes reserved skilled categories for white workers until the 1980s.

Fidesz · EC +04

Coded mildly market: a flat income tax alongside large family transfers and sectoral taxes on foreign firms.

  • Documented act or statuteA fifteen percent flat personal income tax with income tax exemption for mothers of four or more children.
  • Documented act or statuteSector-specific taxes applied principally to foreign-owned banking, retail and telecoms.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Apartheid Nationalism

1948–1994 · South Africa

Permanent legal separation of racial groups with political rights reserved to one of them.

Orbánism

2010– · Hungary

Explicitly 'illiberal democracy': majority rule unconstrained by liberal checks, Christian national identity, opposition to immigration.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas