Atlas / Comparisons / Apartheid Nationalism vs Nordic Social Democracy

Apartheid Nationalism and Nordic Social Democracy

Measured distance across six axes

27.8 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. No axis places them within three points of each other. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, ID, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisNational PartyFolkhemmetGapReading
EC · Economic organisation 00−055DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+10−0616DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power+07−0613DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision+07+025DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+10−0414DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+02−0810DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

National Party · CU +10

At the ceiling: racial classification governed marriage, residence, education and public space by statute.

  • Documented act or statuteThe Immorality and Mixed Marriages Acts criminalised interracial relationships from 1949.
  • Documented act or statuteBantu Education from 1953 prescribed a separate and explicitly inferior curriculum.

Folkhemmet · CU −06

Among the most liberal social legislation in the world, adopted early and by consensus.

  • Documented act or statuteSweden legalised same-sex partnership in 1995 and marriage in 2009; Denmark was first in the world in 1989.
  • Documented act or statuteIndividual taxation, universal childcare and parental leave quotas designed around dual-earner households.

National Party · AU +07

Coded +7 rather than at the ceiling: a genuinely competitive parliament existed for the enfranchised minority.

  • Documented act or statuteElections were contested and the governing party faced real parliamentary opposition throughout.
  • Documented act or statuteStates of emergency from 1985 permitted detention without trial and press censorship for the majority.

Folkhemmet · AU −06

Strongly dispersed authority: proportional representation, coalition norms, and institutionalised bargaining with organised interests.

  • Documented act or statuteGovernment formation has required multi-party coalition or confidence agreement in almost every postwar parliament.
  • Documented act or statuteWage-setting is conducted by employer and union federations rather than by statute.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Apartheid Nationalism

1948–1994 · South Africa

Permanent legal separation of racial groups with political rights reserved to one of them.

Nordic Social Democracy

1932– · Sweden, Norway, Denmark

Universal welfare, full employment and centralised wage bargaining, inside a market economy and a liberal constitution.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas