Atlas / Comparisons / Anarcho-Communism vs Stalinism

Anarcho-Communism and Stalinism

Measured distance across six axes

32.0 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. They agree within three points on EC, CH. They diverge by eight points or more on CU, AU, SC, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisKropotkinSocialism in one countryGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09−101AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order−07+0310DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−10+1020DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision−10+1020DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−08+0311DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+06+082AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Kropotkin · CU −07

Strongly egalitarian on every inherited hierarchy, including within the family and the workplace.

  • ScholarshipNineteenth-century anarchist movements campaigned for free union, secular education and women's autonomy well ahead of socialist parties.

Socialism in one country · CU +03

Coded positive despite Bolshevik origins because the regime reversed its own cultural programme after 1934.

  • Documented act or statuteAbortion was recriminalised in 1936 and divorce made difficult; the 1936 constitution celebrated the family.
  • Documented act or statuteMale homosexuality was recriminalised in 1934.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

Kropotkin · AU −10

At the floor. The state is not to be captured, reformed or used, but abolished.

  • ScholarshipThe 1872 Hague split of the First International turned on precisely this question.

Socialism in one country · AU +10

The party itself was destroyed as an autonomous body, which places this above ordinary one-party rule.

  • Documented act or statuteOf the 1934 Central Committee, roughly two-thirds were shot within four years.
  • Documented act or statuteFactions had been banned inside the party since 1921; by 1937 mere association was capital.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Anarcho-Communism

1872– · Russia, Europe

Abolish the state and private property simultaneously; distribution according to need through voluntary federation.

Stalinism

1928–1953 · USSR

Forced industrialisation and collectivisation under a single leader identified with the party, the state and history itself.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas