Atlas / Comparisons / Anarcho-Communism vs National Socialism

Anarcho-Communism and National Socialism

Measured distance across six axes

38.4 / 49.0 possible

Opposite ends of the recorded space. They agree within three points on CH. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CU, AU, SC, ID.

Axis by axis

AxisKropotkinNSDAPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09+0211DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order−07+0916DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
AU · Organisation of power−10+1020DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
SC · Scale of decision−10+0919DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
ID · Rule of membership−08+1018DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CH · Method and tempo+06+093AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Kropotkin · EC −09

Abolition of private property in the means of production and of money and wages together.

  • Programme textKropotkin's Conquest of Bread argues for distribution according to need with no wage system at all.

NSDAP · EC +02

Ownership stayed private and was pushed further private, while allocation was directed by the state for rearmament. That combination sits just right of the midpoint, not at either pole.

  • Programme textThe 1920 twenty-five point programme demanded nationalisation of trusts, profit-sharing and land expropriation without compensation.
  • Documented act or statuteHitler declared the programme unalterable in 1926 and none of its collectivist points were enacted.

2 more artefacts on the full entry →

Kropotkin · CU −07

Strongly egalitarian on every inherited hierarchy, including within the family and the workplace.

  • ScholarshipNineteenth-century anarchist movements campaigned for free union, secular education and women's autonomy well ahead of socialist parties.

NSDAP · CU +09

Social order was to be reconstituted on racial hierarchy, with women's role restricted by policy and all autonomous civil association dissolved.

  • Documented act or statuteMarried women were pushed out of the professions from 1933 and awarded the Mother's Cross for childbearing from 1938.
  • Documented act or statuteYouth, professional and leisure organisations were merged into party bodies under the Gleichschaltung laws of 1933–34.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Anarcho-Communism

1872– · Russia, Europe

Abolish the state and private property simultaneously; distribution according to need through voluntary federation.

National Socialism

1920–1945 · Germany

A racially defined national community, hierarchy by blood, conquest of living space, extermination of designated enemies.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas