Atlas / Comparisons / Anarcho-Communism vs Minarchist Libertarianism

Anarcho-Communism and Minarchist Libertarianism

Measured distance across six axes

22.1 / 49.0 possible

Opposed programmes with little shared ground. They agree within three points on AU, SC. They diverge by eight points or more on EC, CH.

Axis by axis

AxisKropotkinNozick, LPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation−09+1019DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.
CU · Social and cultural order−07−034DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
AU · Organisation of power−10−082AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision−10−073AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership−08−044DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo+06−039DivergesCarries the disagreement. Any claim that these two are alike has to explain this.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Kropotkin · EC −09

Abolition of private property in the means of production and of money and wages together.

  • Programme textKropotkin's Conquest of Bread argues for distribution according to need with no wage system at all.

Nozick, LP · EC +10

At the market pole: police, courts and defence only.

  • Programme textNozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) derives a night-watchman state and no more.

Kropotkin · CH +06

Coded positive: the tradition accepted insurrection while dividing sharply on individual violence.

  • ScholarshipThe propaganda-of-the-deed period of the 1890s was repudiated by Kropotkin and by the syndicalist current.

Nozick, LP · CH −03

Coded −3: electoral and educational, with an explicit non-aggression principle.

  • Programme textThe non-aggression principle is a membership requirement of the US party.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

Anarcho-Communism

1872– · Russia, Europe

Abolish the state and private property simultaneously; distribution according to need through voluntary federation.

Minarchist Libertarianism

1971– · United States, worldwide

A night-watchman state limited to police, courts and defence; maximum personal and economic freedom otherwise.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas