Atlas / Comparisons / AKP vs Xi-era CCP

AKP and Xi-era CCP

Measured distance across six axes

7.1 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisJustice and Development PartyXi-era CCPGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04−026DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+080AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+08+102AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+103AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+06+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−01−021AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justice and Development Party · EC +04

Coded mildly market: privatisation and construction-led growth alongside very large social assistance and unorthodox rate policy.

  • Documented act or statuteExtensive privatisation of state enterprises through the 2000s.
  • Documented act or statuteInterest rates were cut during high inflation from 2021 on the president's stated doctrine.

Xi-era CCP · EC −02

Most output and employment are private, but party committees sit inside firms and strategic sectors are state-held. Coded just left of centre.

  • Comparative datasetPrivate firms account for the large majority of urban employment and of new job creation.
  • Documented act or statuteThe 2018 company law revision required party organisations inside firms above a size threshold.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

AKP

2001– · Turkey

Conservative religious identity, national sovereignty, and a strong presidency claiming direct popular mandate.

Xi-era CCP

2012– · China

Party leadership over everything, national rejuvenation, common prosperity, and discipline of private capital.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas