Atlas / Comparisons / AKP vs Orbánism

AKP and Orbánism

Measured distance across six axes

1.7 / 49.0 possible

Effectively the same position. They agree within three points on EC, CU, AU, SC, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisJustice and Development PartyFideszGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04+040AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+080AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+08+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+061AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+06+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−01−010AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justice and Development Party · AU +08

Constitutional change by referendum plus mass replacement of judiciary and media after 2016.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2017 referendum replaced the parliamentary system with an executive presidency and abolished the office of prime minister.
  • Documented act or statuteOver four thousand judges and prosecutors were dismissed after the 2016 coup attempt.

Fidesz · AU +07

The reference case for the entry. Elections are real and the institutions that could reverse their outcome have been restructured.

  • Documented act or statuteThe 2011 constitution and subsequent amendments restructured the constitutional court and the judicial appointment system.
  • Documented act or statuteThe 2018 consolidation of some four hundred outlets into a single foundation removed most independent broadcast and print media.

1 more artefact on the full entry →

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

AKP

2001– · Turkey

Conservative religious identity, national sovereignty, and a strong presidency claiming direct popular mandate.

Orbánism

2010– · Hungary

Explicitly 'illiberal democracy': majority rule unconstrained by liberal checks, Christian national identity, opposition to immigration.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas