Atlas / Comparisons / AKP vs MAGA / Trumpism

AKP and MAGA / Trumpism

Measured distance across six axes

5.8 / 49.0 possible

Effectively the same position. They agree within three points on EC, CU, AU, ID, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisJustice and Development PartyMAGA / TrumpismGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04+040AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+080AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+08+062AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+025DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
ID · Rule of membership+06+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
CH · Method and tempo−01+012AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justice and Development Party · SC +07

Coded +7: elected metropolitan authorities constrained and trustees appointed over opposition-held councils.

  • Documented act or statuteState-appointed trustees replaced elected mayors in dozens of south-eastern municipalities from 2016.

MAGA / Trumpism · SC +02

Coded +2: sovereigntist against supranational bodies, and centralising against states and agencies it does not control.

  • Documented act or statuteWithdrawal or threatened withdrawal from multilateral agreements and bodies.
  • Documented act or statuteFederal action against state and municipal policy on immigration enforcement.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

AKP

2001– · Turkey

Conservative religious identity, national sovereignty, and a strong presidency claiming direct popular mandate.

MAGA / Trumpism

2015– · United States

National restoration through a leader who claims to embody the real people against a corrupt establishment; borders, tariffs and sovereignty.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas