Atlas / Comparisons / AKP vs Apartheid Nationalism

AKP and Apartheid Nationalism

Measured distance across six axes

6.8 / 49.0 possible

The same broad family. They agree within three points on CU, AU, SC, CH. No axis separates them by eight points or more.

Axis by axis

AxisJustice and Development PartyNational PartyGapReading
EC · Economic organisation+04 004DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CU · Social and cultural order+08+102AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
AU · Organisation of power+08+071AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
SC · Scale of decision+07+070AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.
ID · Rule of membership+06+104DiffersReal difference, but not the dividing line.
CH · Method and tempo−01+023AgreesEffectively the same position. Not what an argument between them is about.

Each axis runs from −10 to +10; the distance is the straight-line separation across all six at once, out of a maximum of 49.0. How the scoring works →

The evidence behind the widest gaps

A distance figure is worth nothing unless the scores behind it can be checked. These are the artefacts supporting the axes that separate these two most.

Justice and Development Party · EC +04

Coded mildly market: privatisation and construction-led growth alongside very large social assistance and unorthodox rate policy.

  • Documented act or statuteExtensive privatisation of state enterprises through the 2000s.
  • Documented act or statuteInterest rates were cut during high inflation from 2021 on the president's stated doctrine.

National Party · EC 00

Coded at the centre, which surprises people in both directions: extensive state ownership and racially reserved employment inside a capitalist economy.

  • Documented act or statuteState corporations dominated steel, electricity, transport, oil and armaments.
  • Documented act or statuteJob reservation statutes reserved skilled categories for white workers until the 1980s.

What this comparison does not establish

Proximity means similarity of stated position. It carries no claim about competence, circumstance, scale of operation, or what either organisation actually did to the people under it. Two organisations can sit close together and produce entirely different histories, because those things are not on any axis and could not be.

AKP

2001– · Turkey

Conservative religious identity, national sovereignty, and a strong presidency claiming direct popular mandate.

Apartheid Nationalism

1948–1994 · South Africa

Permanent legal separation of racial groups with political rights reserved to one of them.

Distance is not the whole answer. Two organisations can sit the same distance apart for entirely different reasons, and the reason is the content of any claim about them. Open the comparison in the atlas to weight the axes yourself.

Open in the atlas